I can say that of all the questions that clients ask me about photography, this one is usually the first (the other common question is “how can I take better pictures” and I will address that in a separate post). The answer depends on your goal – do you want a simple camera that you don’t have to think much except to point and shoot? If so you would want to pick up a point and shoot camera (aptly named!) as opposed to a SLR, or single-lens reflex, camera. The former is compact and does not allow interchangeable lenses. They are generally very easy to operate, and do not usually have too many manual functions. Do not underestimate these cameras! They can produce quite wonderful images. The great thing is that they are small enough that you can put one in your shirt pocket or purse and thus will almost always have it with you.
Before I go on, let me add that for this article, I will be assuming that you are looking for a digital and not a film camera.
With DSLRs (digital SLRs), you will definitely be able to do more from a creative standpoint. You can use different lens, you can set the camera at certain settings (using aperture and shutter speed, for example) to achieve certain looks you may be after. Essentially, with a single lens reflex camera, you will be able to exert much more control over your images. However, they are also much bulkier, so you have to make sure that if you do invest in a DSLR that you will take it with you. If you have the best camera out there but don’t take it with you because it is too big, then you are much better off buying a cheap little camera that you will have with you so that you won’t miss out on photo opportunities.
So your first decision will be – do you want a point and shoot or a DSLR?
If you want a point and shoot, my recommendation at this time would be any of the Canon Powershots. I use the SD950IS, while my husband uses the SD870IS. I’m not going to go into great lengths as to their specs, which I’m sure you can find via Google (or dpreview.com). But both of these cameras make relatively beautiful images without much work. They are small and very pocketable, and are well-made. The SD1000 is also terrific – not only is it very reasonably priced, images that come out of this little camera is outstanding for a point and shoot. It is also beautifully designed, and even smaller than the SD950 and 870. To illustrate, here is a photo that I took of one of my sons using my Canon point and shoot. All I did was point and shot and the only thing that crossed my mind briefly was the framing/composition of the photograph. I did do a little bit of post-processing, namely, turned the photograph into black and white, ran a noise reduction software, and sharpened it a little bit. (It sounds way more complicated than it is, and the image would’ve been fine without any of the above as I’ll demonstrate as well).
Here is my black and white image:

And here is the same image but only cropped and then slightly adjusted for colour, i.e., a “levels adjustment.” (I find that more often than not the colours straight out of the camera, whether it is a P&S or a top-of-the-line DSLR, is not exactly to my liking so I always tweak it a bit.)


See what I mean? This photograph of my son may not win any awards, but I think that it is not too shabby coming out of a pocket-sized point and shoot camera!
Now, if you are getting quite serious about photography and would like more control of your photographs, then you would want to look into investing in a DSLR. What do I mean by control? Well, with my point and shoot, at least the model I have, I cannot change the shutter speed or the aperture. All those decisions are made by the camera. There is a semi-manual mode where I can choose the ISO, but that is about it. Oh, and I can also tell the camera whether I want flash or not. But essentially that is pretty much it. There are many “dummy modes” otherwise – like portrait, landscape, aquarium, snow, etc. So if you are a super control freak about your camera then a point and shoot may not be for you, lol.
So say you have decided that you need a DSLR. This is when you will have to think about which “system” you’d like to invest in. Do you already have lenses from before? For example, if you already have an arsenal of Nikon lenses (e.g., from your old film cameras), then it would make sense to invest in a Nikon DSLR. If you are starting from scratch, then you have a little bit more of a decision to make. I will suggest some recommendations, but please keep in mind that this is a very subjective list. (It is quite hilarious how people can get very defensive about the cameras they have purchased, and will do anything to convince you to buy the same one.)
You have a few choices as far as brands are concerned: the obvious ones are Nikon and Canon. The not-so-obvious are Sony, Olympus and Fujifilm. There are others but these are the most “mainstream” ones for lack of a better term.
In my opinion, you can’t go wrong with either Canon or Nikon. They both have outstanding cameras and lenses. There seems to be those who are most definitely in the Nikon camp and those who are in the Canon camp. Either one will do just fine, and they both have entry-level SLRs all the way to the top-of-the-line, take-out-a-second-mortgage cameras. If you’re new to SLRs, I would suggest the Nikon D40 or D80, or Canon’s Rebel XTi or 40D. If you would like to spend more money, then you can’t go wrong with the Nikon D300 or Canon’s 40D.
I can’t say much about Sony and Olympus because I am not as familiar with their DSLRs, but I can say that neither of those brands will give you the wide arsenal of lenses that Canon and Nikon will give you. So in my opinion, I’d stick with either Canon or Nikon.
Fujifilm has an interesting camera – the S5. Though Fuji makes the camera, the S5 has a Nikon lens-mount. In other words, the camera will take Nikon’s lenses! The S5 is also an excellent camera, and one that I can recommend. It arguably produces the best skin tones straight out of the camera (SOOC) compared with either Nikon or Canon. Furthermore, the S5 is also known for its dynamic range (ability to record the range of highlights to shadows). However, it remains a bit of a niche camera, popular with wedding photographers due to the camera’s beautiful rendition of skin tones.
Bottom line is this: if you’re looking for a DSLR, you can’t go wrong with Nikon or Canon. Ultimately, it is the glass that makes the difference, and both companies make fantastic glass. It is better to invest in a cheaper camera and better glass. So if you are caught between purchasing a Nikon D40 or a D300, go with the D40 if this means you can spend the rest of your money on a good lens. I’ll do a separate article on lens but basically try to stay away from “consumer zoom lens” and instead stick with a prime lens (fixed focal lens), or if budget allows, a pro-quality zoom (these usually have a fixed aperture of 2.8).
Finally, I highly recommend Downtown Camera, which is located on Queen Street just east of Yonge Street. I buy most of my equipment there myself and find the staff super knowledgeable and helpful, plus, they usually have stock! Ask for Jack or Stan. (No, I do not get any kickbacks from them!!)
Hope this was somewhat helpful! More to follow. Keep yourselves posted.
This post has 1 comment
You have a 2 cute babies. My mother sent a picture of your children and husband. You have a good heart. Im so thankful that my mother is working to you. Although she’s not here guiding us. And send my regards to my mother madam’. Good bless to your family